Jim Jordan raises concern with John Durham regarding FBI
in

Jim Jordan raises concern with John Durham regarding FBI


GOP Rep. Jim Jordan isn’t buying one significant assertion about the FBI by special counsel John Durham in the prosecutor’s criminal inquiry into the origins and conduct of the Russia investigation.

The Ohio congressman revealed his “only concern” stemming from Durham’s indictment of Democratic cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann, who is charged with lying to the FBI about who he was representing when, in September 2016, he presented internet data that suggested a now-discredited link between former President Donald Trump and a Russian bank.

“Somehow, Durham is saying that he doesn’t think the FBI knew who Sussmann was representing, but I just find that hard to believe,” Jordan told Just the News founder John Solomon on his Friday podcast.

Sussmann was indicted last September for allegedly concealing his clients — Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and “Tech Executive-1,” known to be former Neustar executive Rodney Joffe — from FBI general counsel James Baker.

BARR: NO PROSECUTIONS FOR HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP CENSORSHIP

“Sussmann’s false statement misled the FBI General Counsel and other FBI personnel concerning the political nature of his work and deprived the FBI of information that might have permitted it more fully to assess and uncover the origins of the relevant data and technical analysis, including the identities and motivations of Sussmann’s clients,” the indictment said.

Sussmann denies lying to the FBI and has pleaded not guilty. His trial is set to begin next month.

Jordan, who is a lead congressional investigator of the so-called Russiagate conspiracy, stressed that Baker was “actually friends with Sussmann” and cited one of the emails that has come up in the case.

“Jim — it’s Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and sensitive) I need to discuss,” Sussmann wrote to Baker the night before their meeting at the FBI. “Do you have [availability] for a short meeting tomorrow? I’m coming on my own — not on behalf of a client or company — want to help the Bureau. Thanks.”

Baker has since left the FBI and joined Twitter in the summer of 2020.

Durham revealed in a court filing this month that a government agency, identified in media reports as the CIA, found data from Sussmann indicating that coordination between Trump and Russia was “not technically plausible” and “user created.” Durham also asserted that “the Special Counsel’s Office has not reached a definitive conclusion in this regard.”

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Beyond the correspondence with the FBI, Durham said in a prior filing that Sussmann later “provided an updated set of allegations — including the Russian Bank-1 data and additional allegations relating to Trump,” to the agency believed to be the CIA. The Russian bank is Alfa-Bank. The government expects to “adduce evidence at trial” that will reflect that the FBI and the CIA “concluded that the Russian Bank 1 allegations were untrue and unsupported,” Durham said this month.

Jordan said “everything else” in Durham’s efforts he finds to be “encouraging, to see that he’s digging into this and getting to the bottom of it.” He added that what “we all suspected all along,” that the “Clinton campaign was really pushing” the Alfa-Bank connection in the final weeks of the 2020 election, has been affirmed, adding that it now “looks like” people in Clinton’s orbit “made it up out of whole cloth.”





Source link

Written by Daniel Chaitin

What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Webflow aims to bridge the developer-designer gap with its no-code/low-code platform

Webflow aims to bridge the developer-designer gap with its no-code/low-code platform

Free blood pressure machines: Are they accurate?

Free blood pressure machines: Are they accurate?